Home Greek Roman • Aristotle on Teleology (Oxford Aristotle Studies) by Monte Ransome Johnson

Aristotle on Teleology (Oxford Aristotle Studies) by Monte Ransome Johnson

By Monte Ransome Johnson

Aristotle's has been the main influential philosophy within the complete historical past of technological know-how. Monte Johnson examines its so much arguable element: Aristotle's emphasis at the value of ambitions and reasons to medical understanding--his teleology. in certain cases this coverage has proved deeply mistaken, for instance in his earth-centric cosmology, or his anthropology purporting to justify slavery and male domination. yet in lots of components Aristotle's teleology has been winning, and continues to be influential, for instance in adaptationist evolutionary idea, embryology, and genetics. Johnson's publication exhibits additionally how Aristotle's concept has profound implications for environmental ethics and for the idea of worth mostly.

Show description

Read Online or Download Aristotle on Teleology (Oxford Aristotle Studies) PDF

Similar greek & roman books

A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought (Sather Classical Lectures)

The place does the inspiration of unfastened will come from? How and whilst did it increase, and what did that improvement contain? In Michael Frede's substantially new account of the heritage of this concept, the concept of a loose will emerged from robust assumptions concerning the relation among divine windfall, correctness of person selection, and self-enslavement because of improper selection.

How Aristotle Gets By In Metaphysics Zeta

Frank A. Lewis offers a heavily argued exposition of Metaphysics Zeta--one of Aristotle's such a lot dense and arguable texts. it truly is as a rule understood to include Aristotle's private options at the definition of substance and surrounding metaphysical concerns. yet humans have more and more come to acknowledge how little Aristotle says in Zeta approximately his personal thought of (Aristotelian) shape and topic.

The Aristotelian 'Problemata Physica': Philosophical and Scientific Investigations

The Problemata physica is the 3rd longest paintings within the corpus Aristotelicum, yet one of the least studied. It involves 38 books, over 900 chapters, masking an unlimited variety of matters, together with medication and track, intercourse and salt water, fatigue and fruit, animals and astronomy, moderation and malodorous issues, wind and wine, bruises and barley, voice and advantage.

Extra info for Aristotle on Teleology (Oxford Aristotle Studies)

Example text

This treatise was widely influential on Arabic and Hebrew literature; the treatise The Wisdom in God’s Creatures, attributed to Ghazali, contains extensive excerpts of it. ²⁶ Averroes, Al-Kashf ‘an Manahij Al-Adilla (The Exposition of the Methods of Proof), trans. Najjar (2001). Davidson has argued that Averroes’ encouragement of such a proof is ‘not scientific and philosophic’ (1987, p. 229), since such design arguments tend to depend on anthropocentrism (strictly the view that all goods exist for the sake of humans), which Averroes was determined to reject on the grounds that the superior cannot exist for the sake of the inferior (Davidson 1987, pp.

170, citing De Primo Principio IV, sec. 13; see also Adams 2000, p. 162. Historical Background 27 causality as the basis for the explanation of natural things. This is a very important move in the history of Aristotelian interpretation, and it seems to have won acceptance by many of Ockham’s contemporaries and successors, and so it is worth briefly elaborating his position. Ockham clearly distinguishes final from efficient causes,⁴⁶ and argues that sometimes one belongs to a thing, sometimes the other does, and sometimes both do (Quodlibidal Questions iv 1, p.

But since teleology is only a reflective principle of judgment and not a determinate one (like mechanism), it cannot form a science itself, a doctrine of science, or a separate branch of science. In Kant’s terms, it is only a ‘critique of a particular cognitive faculty, namely judgment’ (sec. 79, p. 417). Although it is possible to consider as relatively final whatever products of nature humans can use or adapt to their own purposes, it in no way follows that these things were predestined for human use (p.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.26 of 5 – based on 11 votes